AI training intelligence

Some of your workforce needs AI training. Not everyone. Which is which?

Upload a list of job titles and departments. In under two minutes you get a role-by-role map of where AI training will actually pay off so you invest enablement deliberately instead of everywhere at once.

Ready in under 2 minutes Demo has no account required No names or IDs
Marketing
Market Research Analyst
8.0 TAP score
Matched to Market Research Analysts and Marketing Specialists Confidence 97% match confidence

Market research work is dense with research, segmentation, survey synthesis, performance analysis, and strategy recommendations, making it a clear AI-training priority.

Use-case shape0-3 fit
Top AI use cases
Data analysis Research & retrieval Forecasting Decision advisory
The problem

"Train everyone on AI" is the expensive answer to the wrong question.

Blanket AI training spreads budget evenly across roles that don't all benefit evenly. The roles where AI changes daily work are a subset, and without a map, you can't tell which.

~1,500

distinct job titles in a typical 10,000-person organization, often inconsistent, overlapping, and impossible to map to AI-relevant work by hand.

Most

enablement budgets are allocated by headcount or department politics, not by where the work patterns actually make AI training pay back.

Day 1

is the question every leader gets asked after "we need an AI plan." Talvio turns that into a defensible starting point, not a guess.

Why you can defend this number

Validated against two independent benchmarks and honest about both.

The TAP score is not a black box or a vibe. It is checked against external research, and we tell you exactly where it is strong and where local judgment still matters.

0.92
Spearman rho · Felten AIOE
Strong rank agreement with the Felten AI Occupational Exposure measure, a nationally cited academic benchmark for understanding AI exposure across occupations.
0.42
Spearman rho · Anthropic Economic Index
A moderate check against AEI's observed unique-user AI task-use subset. AEI shows where use is already visible; Talvio is built for broad education planning across all industries and roles.

We don't oversell the precision. National occupation profiles are not your org. Titles and real workflows differ, which is why Talvio ships with Match Review and one-click overrides, so the analyst, not the algorithm, has the final say.

How it works

From roster to roadmap in under two minutes.

Three steps. No integration, no IT project, no employee personal data.

STEP 01

Upload your roster

An Excel or CSV with job titles and departments. No names, IDs, or salary data. One row per employee, up to 10,000 in a standard analysis.

STEP 02

Every role is scored

Each title is matched to a U.S. Department of Labor O*NET occupation and scored with Talvio's reviewed work-activity methodology.

STEP 03

Act on the map

An interactive treemap, department rollup, use-case breakdown, and training-tier cohorts show exactly where training ROI is highest.

What you walk away with

A plan leaders can actually put in a deck.

Not a risk score. A prioritized, costed enablement roadmap with the reasoning attached.

Cohort recommendation

Start with the highest-benefit roles.

The roles that already have enough documentation, data, communication, and decision-support work to justify role-specific AI practice, ranked not guessed.

Tool-gap insight

Train-now vs. waiting on tooling.

Talvio separates use cases to train now from cases where the work pattern exists but approved AI tools are not ready, so you do not train into a dead end.

Top-priority use case

The first training focus, per cohort.

The strongest work-activity driver becomes the lead topic, paired with skip-for-now lists and a transparent cost assumption you can challenge.

Who it's for

Same analysis. Three different jobs to be done.

The output adapts to why you're here.

Bringing this to leadership

You've been asked for an AI workforce plan. Walk in with a role-by-role map, external validation, and a costed starting cohort instead of a hunch.

See the leadership view →

Running an AI transformation

You need enablement sequenced, not sprayed. Use the tool-gap split and tier cohorts to phase rollout where work patterns and approved tools both line up.

Explore the full dashboard →

Advising clients

Multi-client workspaces, white-label executive PPT exports, client viewer links, and a methodology pack, priced per engagement, not per seat.

See the consultant plan →
Pricing

Try the demo. Pay only for your live analysis.

Start with sample workforce data. Upgrade when you're ready to act on your own roster.

Live demo
$0
Every view unlocked, using a realistic sample workforce. The fastest way to see the output.
  • Sample workforce data
  • Treemap, department & tier views
  • Use cases & match review
Try the demo →
Most popular
Full analysis
$249 early access
One payment. Your real workforce data. Every core view unlocked. Early-access price.
  • Your real workforce data
  • Role-by-role TAP scoring and occupation matching
  • Workforce map, department rollups, and role detail
  • Who To Train analysis with tiered education plan
  • What To Train use-case priorities and tool-gap split
  • Match Review overrides and analyst review
  • AI Assistant support for reviewing uncertain matches
  • Up to 10,000 employees
  • Read-only viewer sharing
Get full analysis →
For consultants
$299/mo
For advisory firms running client workforce-prioritization work, with reusable client delivery tools and two analyses included.
  • Multi-client workspaces
  • Two client analyses included
  • AI Assistant support for client match review
  • White-label PPT exports
  • Client viewer links
  • Reusable methodology pack for proposals
  • Executive-ready client deliverables
  • Retained client libraries and workspace history
  • Additional analyses $99 each
View consultant plan →

Early-access pricing is available during beta. Secure checkout via Stripe.

Common questions

The things leaders ask first.

What does TAP actually mean?
TAP means Talvio Augmentation Potential. It is a 0-10 role-level score for AI training prioritization, not automation risk and not employee performance.
How accurate are the scores?
Validated in May 2026 against Felten AIOE (Spearman rho=0.92, O*NET-structure-derived) and independently corroborated against the Anthropic Economic Index observed AI task-use (Spearman rho=0.42, n=480 SOC6 occupations, 54% subset, release_2026_03_24). The AEI result is moderate, and we report it that way deliberately.
What file format do I need?
Excel (.xlsx) or CSV with two columns: Job Title and Department. One row per employee. No names, IDs, or sensitive data needed.
What happens to my data?
Your analysis remains available in your account. You can delete it when you no longer need it. Nothing is sold, and you should upload titles and departments only, not personal employee information. Talvio can optionally use an external LLM integration to assist with AI matching if you choose that support; otherwise, matching is handled through Talvio's proprietary algorithms.
Can I share results with my team?
Yes. Paid analyses can be shared with read-only viewers from Settings by email invite. Each viewer gets their own login; the account owner keeps control over exports, billing, and saved edits.

See where AI training actually pays off in your workforce.

Start with the live demo on sample data, or run your own full analysis. An interactive TAP analysis in under two minutes.